Phone Sex
$1.49 A MINUTE
(no hidden charges, no activation fees or minimums, first time callers get 3 free minutes, you can even use a pre-paid visa card)
Friday, November 28, 2008
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Saturday, September 06, 2008
$1.98 for 10 minutes of Phone Sex
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Monday, August 18, 2008
AHHHH, Finally!
WOW, summer is almost over and I have been so busy I have barely been o NiteFlirt. Don't think I do not LOVE and MISS all of you. I will be available most evening and weekends again, but I was having so much fun this summer I couldn't stop.
So my sweet little sissies, keep looking for me and keep calling I miss getting you on your back with your legs in the air.
So my sweet little sissies, keep looking for me and keep calling I miss getting you on your back with your legs in the air.
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Writing about my sluts
I had a cute little slut ask me to write about him in my blog, but upon looking at my account, I see he has called me 3 times for a total of 9 minutes. Maybe I will write about him, when we talk long enough for me to have something to write about, I mean, every one of my callers is a cock sucking strap on sissy.
I write about my INTERESTING callers.
All NEW CALLERS GET THREE FREE MINUTES!!
I write about my INTERESTING callers.
Erotic Sexual Talk $1.63 Per Minute 18+ only CC Req'd.
All NEW CALLERS GET THREE FREE MINUTES!!
Friday, June 20, 2008
One More Week before I start my full time job.
Well, it seems to me that the phone sex biz is slowing down, I do not have nearly as many callers as I had in the past and even sending incentives has failed. Maybe it is time for this 7 year Veteran to retire. It can't hurt to get a real 9-5 job and let someone else pay my taxes/SS/Medicare and benefits for me.
Plus I am getting a pension and 401K. And I do not have to work weekends (Maybe I will still do NF)
So Just remember. look for me on the weekends starting June 30th maybe a few evenings as well
Plus I am getting a pension and 401K. And I do not have to work weekends (Maybe I will still do NF)
So Just remember. look for me on the weekends starting June 30th maybe a few evenings as well
Friday, June 13, 2008
Free Phone Sex
This week has been very interesting so far I actually stayed up all night last night and took some calls from some sissies. It was so much fun making them beg me to pound them with a strap on.
I love making them cum in their hands and lick it all up.
Bu I did get a caller on my Anything Goes listing last night that almost put me to sleep, not because he was boring, but because his voice was so mellow, I could have listened to him talk all night long.
Just a reminder guys, the free phone sex is only if you are a new customer to NiteFlirt.
3 minutes free then $1.63 a minute thereafter.
I love making them cum in their hands and lick it all up.
Bu I did get a caller on my Anything Goes listing last night that almost put me to sleep, not because he was boring, but because his voice was so mellow, I could have listened to him talk all night long.
Just a reminder guys, the free phone sex is only if you are a new customer to NiteFlirt.
3 minutes free then $1.63 a minute thereafter.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Free Phone Sex.....Live. NiteFlirt
As you know I am somewhat of a phone sex icon. I like to think that I am one of the more senior flirts on Niteflirt as I started my account right before I started college in 2001 as a way to make money while I was in school.
One of the things I like most about NiteFlirt is they let you try it out for free and there are no minimums. I mean, you do not have to pre pay for a 20 minute call or a 10 minute call. As you and I both know, me especially, that sometimes the girl is so good, she gets you off in 2-5 minutes, and guess what, you do not get your money back.
That is why I like Niteflirt for my customers. It is like any type of service. Have you ever tried to call Microsoft, you have to pay $45 (last time I checked) to talk to someone live, even if you only talk to them for 30 second, that is not right.
Also NiteFlirt has this amazing thing where if you want to you can give me a "tribute" or "gift" right over the phone or right on my listing.
So if you want one of the most amazing experiences available to you, and not have to sign over your first born to get it, try setting up an account on Niteflirt and give me a call.
First 3 minutes are Free, $1.63 a minute after that.
You must be 18 and have a valid Credit/Debit.
One of the things I like most about NiteFlirt is they let you try it out for free and there are no minimums. I mean, you do not have to pre pay for a 20 minute call or a 10 minute call. As you and I both know, me especially, that sometimes the girl is so good, she gets you off in 2-5 minutes, and guess what, you do not get your money back.
That is why I like Niteflirt for my customers. It is like any type of service. Have you ever tried to call Microsoft, you have to pay $45 (last time I checked) to talk to someone live, even if you only talk to them for 30 second, that is not right.
Also NiteFlirt has this amazing thing where if you want to you can give me a "tribute" or "gift" right over the phone or right on my listing.
So if you want one of the most amazing experiences available to you, and not have to sign over your first born to get it, try setting up an account on Niteflirt and give me a call.
First 3 minutes are Free, $1.63 a minute after that.
You must be 18 and have a valid Credit/Debit.
Sunday, May 04, 2008
Happy Sunday!!!
OK, Tomorrow is Cinco De Mayo, and well, hopefully all of you know by now that it is my favorite Holiday. Well, no other day of the year can I get $1.00 Margaritas EVERYWHERE I go.
I know I sound like such a lush, but Margarita season means summer is coming, and that means less clothing and hot, steamy, sweaty SEX. Especially after I have a few Margaritas :-).
So, hopefully my nex post is about all the fun I have tomorrow.
I know I sound like such a lush, but Margarita season means summer is coming, and that means less clothing and hot, steamy, sweaty SEX. Especially after I have a few Margaritas :-).
So, hopefully my nex post is about all the fun I have tomorrow.
Saturday, May 03, 2008
Moved And Raring to Go
OK, now that I have gotten completely moved into my new apartment,, I can finally get back to what is important to me. Making my sweeties happy. I know it has been way to long since we have played and I am hornier than EVER.
This Dominant slut is ready to go and waiting for a big hard cock to make cum. Are you worthy?
This Dominant slut is ready to go and waiting for a big hard cock to make cum. Are you worthy?
Friday, January 11, 2008
Women Are Never Front-Runners
By GLORIA STEINEM
THE woman in question became a lawyer after some years as a community organizer, married a corporate lawyer and is the mother of two little girls, ages 9 and 6. Herself the daughter of a white American mother and a black African father — in this race-conscious country, she is considered black — she served as a state legislator for eight years, and became an inspirational voice for national unity.
Be honest: Do you think this is the biography of someone who could be elected to the United States Senate? After less than one term there, do you believe she could be a viable candidate to head the most powerful nation on earth?
If you answered no to either question, you’re not alone. Gender is probably the most restricting force in American life, whether the question is who must be in the kitchen or who could be in the White House. This country is way down the list of countries electing women and, according to one study, it polarizes gender roles more than the average democracy.
That’s why the Iowa primary was following our historical pattern of making change. Black men were given the vote a half-century before women of any race were allowed to mark a ballot, and generally have ascended to positions of power, from the military to the boardroom, before any women (with the possible exception of obedient family members in the latter).
If the lawyer described above had been just as charismatic but named, say, Achola Obama instead of Barack Obama, her goose would have been cooked long ago. Indeed, neither she nor Hillary Clinton could have used Mr. Obama’s public style — or Bill Clinton’s either — without being considered too emotional by Washington pundits.
So why is the sex barrier not taken as seriously as the racial one? The reasons are as pervasive as the air we breathe: because sexism is still confused with nature as racism once was; because anything that affects males is seen as more serious than anything that affects “only” the female half of the human race; because children are still raised mostly by women (to put it mildly) so men especially tend to feel they are regressing to childhood when dealing with a powerful woman; because racism stereotyped black men as more “masculine” for so long that some white men find their presence to be masculinity-affirming (as long as there aren’t too many of them); and because there is still no “right” way to be a woman in public power without being considered a you-know-what.
I’m not advocating a competition for who has it toughest. The caste systems of sex and race are interdependent and can only be uprooted together. That’s why Senators Clinton and Obama have to be careful not to let a healthy debate turn into the kind of hostility that the news media love. Both will need a coalition of outsiders to win a general election. The abolition and suffrage movements progressed when united and were damaged by division; we should remember that.
I’m supporting Senator Clinton because like Senator Obama she has community organizing experience, but she also has more years in the Senate, an unprecedented eight years of on-the-job training in the White House, no masculinity to prove, the potential to tap a huge reservoir of this country’s talent by her example, and now even the courage to break the no-tears rule. I’m not opposing Mr. Obama; if he’s the nominee, I’ll volunteer. Indeed, if you look at votes during their two-year overlap in the Senate, they were the same more than 90 percent of the time. Besides, to clean up the mess left by President Bush, we may need two terms of President Clinton and two of President Obama.
But what worries me is that he is seen as unifying by his race while she is seen as divisive by her sex.
What worries me is that she is accused of “playing the gender card” when citing the old boys’ club, while he is seen as unifying by citing civil rights confrontations.
What worries me is that male Iowa voters were seen as gender-free when supporting their own, while female voters were seen as biased if they did and disloyal if they didn’t.
What worries me is that reporters ignore Mr. Obama’s dependence on the old — for instance, the frequent campaign comparisons to John F. Kennedy, though Senator Edward Kennedy is supporting Senator Clinton — while not challenging the slander that her progressive policies are part of the Washington status quo.
What worries me is that some women, perhaps especially younger ones, hope to deny or escape the sexual caste system; thus Iowa women over 50 and 60, who disproportionately supported Senator Clinton, proved once again that women are the one group that grows more radical with age.
This country can no longer afford to choose our leaders from a talent pool limited by sex, race, money, powerful fathers and paper degrees. It’s time to take equal pride in breaking all the barriers. We have to be able to say: “I’m supporting her because she’ll be a great president and because she’s a woman.”
THE woman in question became a lawyer after some years as a community organizer, married a corporate lawyer and is the mother of two little girls, ages 9 and 6. Herself the daughter of a white American mother and a black African father — in this race-conscious country, she is considered black — she served as a state legislator for eight years, and became an inspirational voice for national unity.
Be honest: Do you think this is the biography of someone who could be elected to the United States Senate? After less than one term there, do you believe she could be a viable candidate to head the most powerful nation on earth?
If you answered no to either question, you’re not alone. Gender is probably the most restricting force in American life, whether the question is who must be in the kitchen or who could be in the White House. This country is way down the list of countries electing women and, according to one study, it polarizes gender roles more than the average democracy.
That’s why the Iowa primary was following our historical pattern of making change. Black men were given the vote a half-century before women of any race were allowed to mark a ballot, and generally have ascended to positions of power, from the military to the boardroom, before any women (with the possible exception of obedient family members in the latter).
If the lawyer described above had been just as charismatic but named, say, Achola Obama instead of Barack Obama, her goose would have been cooked long ago. Indeed, neither she nor Hillary Clinton could have used Mr. Obama’s public style — or Bill Clinton’s either — without being considered too emotional by Washington pundits.
So why is the sex barrier not taken as seriously as the racial one? The reasons are as pervasive as the air we breathe: because sexism is still confused with nature as racism once was; because anything that affects males is seen as more serious than anything that affects “only” the female half of the human race; because children are still raised mostly by women (to put it mildly) so men especially tend to feel they are regressing to childhood when dealing with a powerful woman; because racism stereotyped black men as more “masculine” for so long that some white men find their presence to be masculinity-affirming (as long as there aren’t too many of them); and because there is still no “right” way to be a woman in public power without being considered a you-know-what.
I’m not advocating a competition for who has it toughest. The caste systems of sex and race are interdependent and can only be uprooted together. That’s why Senators Clinton and Obama have to be careful not to let a healthy debate turn into the kind of hostility that the news media love. Both will need a coalition of outsiders to win a general election. The abolition and suffrage movements progressed when united and were damaged by division; we should remember that.
I’m supporting Senator Clinton because like Senator Obama she has community organizing experience, but she also has more years in the Senate, an unprecedented eight years of on-the-job training in the White House, no masculinity to prove, the potential to tap a huge reservoir of this country’s talent by her example, and now even the courage to break the no-tears rule. I’m not opposing Mr. Obama; if he’s the nominee, I’ll volunteer. Indeed, if you look at votes during their two-year overlap in the Senate, they were the same more than 90 percent of the time. Besides, to clean up the mess left by President Bush, we may need two terms of President Clinton and two of President Obama.
But what worries me is that he is seen as unifying by his race while she is seen as divisive by her sex.
What worries me is that she is accused of “playing the gender card” when citing the old boys’ club, while he is seen as unifying by citing civil rights confrontations.
What worries me is that male Iowa voters were seen as gender-free when supporting their own, while female voters were seen as biased if they did and disloyal if they didn’t.
What worries me is that reporters ignore Mr. Obama’s dependence on the old — for instance, the frequent campaign comparisons to John F. Kennedy, though Senator Edward Kennedy is supporting Senator Clinton — while not challenging the slander that her progressive policies are part of the Washington status quo.
What worries me is that some women, perhaps especially younger ones, hope to deny or escape the sexual caste system; thus Iowa women over 50 and 60, who disproportionately supported Senator Clinton, proved once again that women are the one group that grows more radical with age.
This country can no longer afford to choose our leaders from a talent pool limited by sex, race, money, powerful fathers and paper degrees. It’s time to take equal pride in breaking all the barriers. We have to be able to say: “I’m supporting her because she’ll be a great president and because she’s a woman.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)